Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majesco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:24, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Majesco

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Majesco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The present article is almost entirely based on press releases publicized by the subject itself through BusinessWire. Real-world sources appear to be scarce; there are some re-hashes of press releases on "business review" websites, and apparently it was on a CNBC infomercial once, but there is nothing substantial that would satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Lordtobi (✉) 06:42, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lordtobi (✉) 06:42, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Lordtobi (✉) 06:42, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:18, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. No real coverage hence the reason to use businesswire.com which is non-RS I think. What is there fairly run of the mill business news, revenue reporting. scope_creep^Talk 20:43, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

  Business Wire is technically a reliable source but only because it is also a primary one: it acts primarily as a channel for press releases. Primary sources cannot demonstrate notability. Lordtobi (✉) 21:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

• Delete: Let's ask ourselves: What's significant about this company? What impact did it have on the planet or history? Founded in 1992. Acquired such-and-such companies in 2005, 2007, and 2015. Okay, but did it do anything unique or significant? Or is it just another company? Flowing dreams (talk) 07:53, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
• Delete It appears to be just a run of the mill business that is not notable. Taewangkorea (talk) 12:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.