Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual Pursuit
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 17:25, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sexual Pursuit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Beyond one review, there is no other coverage by reliable third-party sources of this anime. Fails WP:NOTE and WP:NFILM. Prod disputed by IP. —Farix (t | c) 02:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- —Farix (t | c) 02:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weakdelete - I do not know the RS status of the GameFAQs review [1] but I think the Mania review [2] is RS. – Allen4names 19:49, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- GameFAQs reviews are reviews by individual users of the site. They would definitely not qualify as a reliable source. Calathan (talk) 03:38, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It needs as least 2 more RS reviews then. – Allen4names 00:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see any non-Mania reviews in my CSE (after cleaning out many hentai sites). --Gwern (contribs) 22:10 16 December 2010 (GMT)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.